Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Preliminary use of CM-SAF cloud and radiation products for evaluation of regional climate simulations: Visiting Scientist Report Climate Monitoring SAF (CM-SAF)
SMHI, Research Department, Climate research - Rossby Centre.
2008 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

We have compared monthly mean cloud and radiation fields from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring SAF (CM-SAF, http://www.cmsaf.eu) data base with the clouds and radiation simulated by the Rossby Centre regional climate model (RCA) and by the European Centre Medium range Weather Forecast model (ECMWF) over Europe and North Africa for the time period January 2005 to December 2006.ECMWF and RCA overestimate the cloud fraction by 20% over snow covered regions in the north east of Europe and overestimate the surface downwelling longwave radiation (SDL) by 20-40W/m2 and surface outgoing longwave radiation by 10-30W/m2. The RCA-simulated clouds have too much cloud water in northern Europe in summer and in autumn and they therefore reflect too much shortwave radiation at the TOA (TRS) and this also leads to an underestimation of the incoming shortwave radiation (SIS) at the surface. Over most of Europe and over sea ECMWF (all year) and RCA (in winter-spring) underestimate the cloud fraction which could explain a corresponding underestimate of TRS, overestimate of SIS and underestimate of SDL. The satellites overestimate cloud cover over sea due to problems in the treatment of sub-pixel cloudiness and therefore the models underestimates are larger over sea. Mainly RCA but also ECMWF overestimate cloud fraction on top of mountains and underestimate it along mountain ranges and have corresponding differences in the TOA and surface radiation fluxes compared to the CM-SAF data.Over North Africa RCA underestimates TRS by -11W/m2 and overestimates the TOA emitted thermal radiation (TET) by 8W/m2. ECMWF underestimates TRS by -28W/m2 and overestimates TET by 14W/m2. These errors are similar to what has been found for many other global models and are attributed to clear sky errors either due to too high surface temperatures, errors in emissivity, albedo or lack of aerosols. Adding clear and cloudy skies radiation fluxes to the CM-SAF data base would help us to understand the reasons for ECMWF and RCA errors. The polar orbiting satellite retrieval for 2005-2006 erroneously overestimated cloud fraction over North Africa, which also affects the CM-SAF derived surface radiation fluxes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SMHI , 2008. , 48 p.
Series
Meteorology, ISSN 0283-7730 ; 131
Keyword [en]
CM-SAF, clouds and radiation, regional climate model, ECMWF
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:smhi:diva-2241Local ID: Meteorologi, Rapporter, Serie MeteorologiOAI: oai:DiVA.org:smhi-2241DiVA: diva2:947534
Available from: 2008-04-24 Created: 2016-07-08 Last updated: 2016-07-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(29930 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 29930 kBChecksum SHA-512
65355d3fac3c5e9e99fea45e931f9486c59f0c56f6551b525d9c63ee0faa442322070aa1a218fcc2eead6686ced91aaba507e1edc523e3809334dca50f9aed42
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Willén, Ulrika
By organisation
Climate research - Rossby Centre

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.26.0
|