Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosol in southern Sweden
SMHI, Research Department, Air quality.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2910-747X
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics, ISSN 1680-7316, E-ISSN 1680-7324, Vol. 11, no 22, p. 11387-11400Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A one-year study was performed at the Vavihill background station in southern Sweden to estimate the anthropogenic contribution to the carbonaceous aerosol. Weekly samples of the particulate matter PM10 were collected on quartz filters, and the amounts of organic carbon, elemental carbon, radiocarbon (C-14) and levoglucosan were measured. This approach enabled source apportionment of the total carbon in the PM10 fraction using the concentration ratios of the sources. The sources considered in this study were emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, as well as biogenic sources. During the summer, the carbonaceous aerosol mass was dominated by compounds of biogenic origin (80 %), which are associated with biogenic primary and secondary organic aerosols. During the winter months, biomass combustion (32 %) and fossil fuel combustion (28 %) were the main contributors to the carbonaceous aerosol. Elemental carbon concentrations in winter were about twice as large as during summer, and can be attributed to biomass combustion, probably from domestic wood burning. The contribution of fossil fuels to elemental carbon was stable throughout the year, although the fossil contribution to organic carbon increased during the winter. Thus, the organic aerosol originated mainly from natural sources during the summer and from anthropogenic sources during the winter. The result of this source apportionment was compared with results from the EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model. The model and measurements were generally consistent for total atmospheric organic carbon, however, the contribution of the sources varied substantially. E.g. the biomass burning contributions of OC were underestimated by the model by a factor of 2.2 compared to the measurements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 11, no 22, p. 11387-11400
National Category
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
Research subject
Environment
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:smhi:diva-546DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-11387-2011ISI: 000298134200004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:smhi-546DiVA, id: diva2:805340
Available from: 2015-04-15 Created: 2015-04-15 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(423 kB)247 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 423 kBChecksum SHA-512
476da726fa281d9c5a61c3dbe8338ef5024c7e98d130a1b50d61b7d01e85fde6ff9934e85fbf2074e3d2704f11079efb3770a0b05acb591313cf06c7940824b9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Bergström, Robert

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergström, Robert
By organisation
Air quality
In the same journal
Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 248 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 294 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf