Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of Aeolus winds using ground-based radars in Antarctica and in northern Sweden
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, ISSN 1867-1381, E-ISSN 1867-8548, Vol. 14, no 8, p. 5415-5428Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Winds measured by lidar from the Aeolus satellite are compared with winds measured by two ground-based radars - MARA in Antarctica (70.77 degrees S, 11.73 degrees E) and ES-RAD (67.88 degrees N, 21.10 degrees E) in Arctic Sweden - for the period 1 July-31 December 2019. Aeolus is a demonstrator mission to test whether winds measured by Doppler lidar from space can have sufficient accuracy to contribute to improved weather forecasting. A comprehensive programme of calibration and validation has been undertaken following the satellite launch in 2018, but, so far, direct comparison with independent measurements from the Arctic or Antarctic regions have not been made. The comparison covers heights from the low troposphere to just above the tropopause. Results for each radar site are presented separately for Rayleigh (clear) winds, Mie (cloudy) winds, sunlit ("summer") and non-sunlit ("winter") seasons, and ascending and descending satellite tracks. Horizontally projected line-of-sight (HLOS) winds from Aeolus, reprocessed using baseline 2B10, for passes within 100 km of the radar sites, are compared with HLOS winds calculated from 1 h averaged radar horizontal wind components. The agreement in most data subsets is very good, with no evidence of significant biases (<1ms(-1)). Possible biases are identified for two subsets (about -2ms(-1) for the Rayleigh winds for the descending passes at MARA and about 2ms(-1) for the Mie winds for the ascending passes at ESRAD, both in winter), but these are only marginally significant. A robust significant bias of about 7ms(-1) is found for the Mie winds for the ascending tracks at MARA in summer. There is also some evidence for increased random error (by about 1ms(-1) / for the Aeolus Mie winds at MARA in summer compared to winter. This might be related to the presence of sunlight scatter over the whole of Antarctica as Aeolus transits across it during summer.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 14, no 8, p. 5415-5428
National Category
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
Research subject
Meteorology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:smhi:diva-6155DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-5415-2021ISI: 000683772700003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:smhi-6155DiVA, id: diva2:1589404
Available from: 2021-08-31 Created: 2021-08-31 Last updated: 2021-08-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Validation of Aeolus winds using ground-based radars in Antarctica and in northern Sweden(2458 kB)128 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2458 kBChecksum SHA-512
f6f390b350bc15345e7ad33c6c7062f43330c3552faa37ccd3136cbe5da2987e597aab444a977fc151d6891a669758e9e3fac242e63b7ab3195b88fc96a565dd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Hagelin, SusannaLindskog, MagnusKörnich, Heiner

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagelin, SusannaLindskog, MagnusKörnich, Heiner
By organisation
Meteorology
In the same journal
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 128 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 183 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf